Using AI as an editor, a dilemma. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ - re: Timothée Chalatmet v. Nicholas Fuentes
In my last post I made a political predication/ statement.
I am new to swimming in such waters on the internet. I have always tended to stay away making arguments over text online. For many reasons but one being it seems like it takes up a lot of time and opens up many vectors of attack.
So after writing out my last post Timothée Chalatmet v. Nicholas Fuentes, out of insecurity, I pasted it into DuckAI1 and asked for a critique.
I found myself changing a lot or feeling like I needed to change a lot based on this llm's feedback. And after making a few changes I stopped myself...
is it truly my writing if I'm using an llm to rewrite even a portion of it?
So I stopped and posted the original draft (save for a few grammar/formatting/spelling mistakes).
That is what felt right.
What do you think about this dilemma?
I'd be curious.
How I feel about it:
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
i dunno.
I have been using DuckAI over other llm's because it says it's private and run by duckduckgo. I know it probably is not but it's useful and I'm not either in the fuck AI or AI maximalist camp... yet.↩